Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/27/2003 11:49:09 AM PST by masterag78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: masterag78
What happened to Freedom of Speech?

Well, there is another part of the First Amendment called Freedom of Association - if the newspaper in question doesn't want to run your ad because they disagree with the content, they don't have to. That ain't censorship, just as the Boy Scouts can't be forced to admit gays.

2 posted on 03/27/2003 11:50:26 AM PST by dirtboy (Rally For America - Steps of PA State Capitol, Harrisburg - March 29 at high noon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: masterag78
It's like this: Freedom of the press belongs to the fellow that owns it.

Don't like it? Start your own newspaper. No law against it.
6 posted on 03/27/2003 11:57:51 AM PST by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: masterag78
but I fail to see how a newspaper that is supposed to also be serving the interest of the public

A newspaper business is no more "serving the interest of the public" than a cable company is. They are serving their own interest, and that's ok.

7 posted on 03/27/2003 11:57:59 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: masterag78
My sense is that as a private business the newspaper can exercise editorial control, including choosing which paid advertising business they will accept. I recall there was this controversy with some campus newspapers refusing to run the Horowitz reparations ads. They can choose not to run them, and those so refused are free to criticize that choice in other venues that might be more accomodating to a diversity of viewpoints (and those are usually conservative, not liberal forums).

OTOH, the courts have muddied the waters a bit with rulings based on this "public accomodation" notion. Some of the opponents of the Boy Scouts tried to play this gambit, but it didn't pass muster. Other things have. I wonder if its been tried with newspapers and other forms of media?

12 posted on 03/27/2003 12:07:32 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: masterag78
Call them say you want to buy an ad denouncing the war.

Then call them and say you want to run a page supporing the war.

Tape record and transcribe the conversations (if they do not match)

Distribute locally on fliers and on the internet.
15 posted on 03/27/2003 12:12:54 PM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: masterag78
Well, I would have been surprised that Brenham wouldn't let you say you support Pres. Bush in your ad. I understand your outrage after all the anti war and anti Bush garbage we have been subjected to. I will leave the legalities to the other posters and just say I support your attempt to try and get your point of view into the ad.
16 posted on 03/27/2003 12:13:02 PM PST by Reb Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: masterag78
The only entity that can infringe your freedom of speech is the GOVERNMENT!

That private newspaper is free to print whatever they want on each page. You can't force them to print your stuff.

Freedom of speech means that the government can't stop you from printing up your own papers with your own content.
17 posted on 03/27/2003 12:26:10 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson