Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
If this is real, why didn't the photographer pick up the baby?
From the article:
This shot was taken by an English tourist during her visit to main land china. The baby girl was barely alive when the picture was taken. By the time the English tourist was able to bring the baby to authorities the baby died. The Chinese Athorites confiscated the film but she just put in a new roll of film in, so they took the new role.

18 posted on 03/03/2003 11:16:54 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: eastsider
This shot was taken by an English tourist during her visit to main land china. The baby girl was barely alive when the picture was taken. By the time the English tourist was able to bring the baby to authorities the baby died. The Chinese Athorites confiscated the film but she just put in a new roll of film in, so they took the new role.

As you can see, at least three pictures were taken, circling the baby as the shutter clicked. Would you have taken even one? I would not have, I'd have immediately dropped to my knees, torn off my shirt, and wrapped and cradled the little girl.

Therefore, I am suspicious of one of two things... either the authenticity of the pictures or the humanity of the photographer.

I have no love for the regime of the Red Chinese, and the sooner they follow Hitler and Stalin into their just reward, the better. However, the circumstances surrounding these pictures don't pass the smell test. Even if the picures are real, it's possible that three of the four Chinese shown didn't even see her. That can not be said of the photographer.




21 posted on 03/03/2003 11:38:33 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson