Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode; PatrickHenry; Junior
In my experience, "Darwinian" or "Darwinist" as a term, exists only in the vocabulary of anti-evolution Creationists.
4 posted on 02/08/2003 8:22:39 AM PST by balrog666 (Who stole my tag line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Bilge for your mill.
5 posted on 02/08/2003 8:28:42 AM PST by balrog666 (Who stole my tag line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
It's the old "argument from consequences." It doesn't matter whether or not evolution is true, it must be suppressed "for the good of the children."
6 posted on 02/08/2003 8:31:19 AM PST by Junior (I stole your tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
In my experience, "Darwinian" or "Darwinist" as a term, exists only in the vocabulary of anti-evolution Creationists.

This whole article stinks, reminds me of the "Who Wrote This, Ted Kazinsky(sp?) Or Al Gore" article, pompous straw man BS.

10 posted on 02/08/2003 8:51:58 AM PST by TightSqueeze (From the Department of Homeland Security, sponsors of Liberty-Lite, Less Freedom! / Red Tape!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
That is not true. All recent proponents of evolutionary theory (Dawkins, Gould, et al) call themselves neo-Darwinists becuase they all profess fealty to the mechanism of natural selction as the prinicipal evolutionary mechanism.

All of their theories (saltationism, selfish gene) suffer from the same defects as outlined in the article. Dawkin's theory, stripped of its its scientific pretensions, becomes even more fantastic as it is a form of vitalism similar to Bergson's "elan vital".
18 posted on 02/08/2003 11:13:20 AM PST by ggekko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
In my experience, "Darwinian" or "Darwinist" as a term, exists only in the vocabulary of anti-evolution Creationists.

That experience must be limited, since it can be found in a dictionary.

20 posted on 02/08/2003 4:01:33 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
In my experience, "Darwinian" or "Darwinist" as a term, exists only in the vocabulary of anti-evolution Creationists.

Whatever. It seems to me that it says a lot about evolutionists if they are so quick to dismiss and bury the founder of their theory. But hey, who am I to say, after all, I am not an evolutionist.

28 posted on 02/09/2003 7:10:22 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
In my experience, "Darwinian" or "Darwinist" as a term, exists only in the vocabulary of anti-evolution Creationists.

FWIW, the author of this piece (David Stove) is an atheist. Dunno if that affects your perception of this article or not!
64 posted on 02/10/2003 6:49:41 AM PST by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
In my experience, "Darwinian" or "Darwinist" as a term, exists only in the vocabulary of anti-evolution Creationists.

That has also been my experience. "Darwinism" is a pejorative created by Creationists to bash anyone who does not believe in their version of reality.

116 posted on 02/10/2003 6:42:46 PM PST by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
Who pays these guys to spread their propaganda?
159 posted on 02/11/2003 6:36:28 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson