Replies

If homosexuality is genetic (I don't buy it) then it is a genetic and hormonal error. Otherwise, their bodies would adapt to their desires rather than be contrary to them. It is not normal for a man to feel like he is really a woman, or vice versa. A lesbian would have no need of monthly cycles and all of that. She would also have some way to actually have intercourse with her desired female mate. Gay men would have genitals that fit together, or at least a different anus -- and no sperm.

Everyone can claim it's genetic and normal (equal to heterosexuality) all they want, but all I see is a "I want to therefore it's normal" argument. That is not enough to change the definition of marriage and family. It is not enough to force the concept on all children in school, church and the Boy Scouts. It is not enough to change the definition of morality. It only takes a couple of eyes and half a brain to know the human species was designed (or evolved -- whichever you prefer) for opposite sexes to mate.

You're not understanding evolution which requires mutation, error, diversity, variation, etc. Homosexuality to a certain extent is present in many species. No its not the mean, I didn't say whether it's normal or abnormal. And hormonal/genetic variation that might lead a woman to be gay doesn't mean that her entire body is going to be rescripted and therefore she will have no monthly cycles. That's silly reasoning, you just don't understand evolution and genetics at all.

What moral/ethical/"normal"/"abnormal" spin you put on it is your own. I didn't put any spin on it myself. You totally ignored the science because apparently you find it so threatening.