Skip to comments.
Shocker: Am I Anti-Gay? ["Gays" malign "Gay"-friendly Pychology Today editor]
Psychology Today ^
| Jan/Feb 2003
| Robert Epstein
Posted on 01/29/2003 11:29:48 AM PST by Notwithstanding
Summary: You be the judge. A letter form the editor in chief.
... I bring these matters to your attention because of a threatening phone call I received a few weeks ago from a fellow psychologist. On page 78 of our last issue, PT ran a small ad for a book called A Parent's Guide to Preventing Homosexuality by Joseph Nicolosi, Ph.D., and his wife Linda. Nicolosi is a psychologist who specializes in trying to help unhappy gays become straight. Apparently feeling that this rather modest contribution to the literature on homosexuality wasn't getting enough attention, the psychologist, who identified herself as a lesbian activist, called me at home on a Saturday to tell me that PT should not have run such a heinous ad, that she was speaking for "thousands" of gays who were going to boycott PT, "and worse," that Dr. Nicolosi was a "bigot," that no gay person had ever successfully become straight, that homosexuality was entirely determined by genes, and that sexual conversion therapy had been condemned by the American Psychological Association. I told her that the editorial department at PT has no connection whatsoever with the advertising department, but she was unimpressed. She subsequently posted messages on the Internet urging people to harrass me at home (no one else ever did) and to send me complaint letters.
In all, I received about 120 letters, many of which exemplified a bad game of Telephone: Some people complained about an anti-gay "article" PT had published; others referred to an anti-gay book I had published and people who weren't subscribers said they were dropping their subscriptions. Several writers suggested I was a "Nazi" and a "bigot," and one compared me with the Taliban. A surprising number of letters asserted that gays have a right to be rude or abusive because they themselves have been abused. Most echoed the same points that my caller had made....
(Excerpt) Read more at psychologytoday.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-324 next last
Great find by Polycarp.
To: Polycarp
something to carp about
2
posted on
01/29/2003 11:33:16 AM PST
by
Notwithstanding
(Are you pro-abortion because you were involved with one?)
To: Notwithstanding; *Catholic_list; .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; ...
And a hearty bump to you!
3
posted on
01/29/2003 11:34:54 AM PST
by
Polycarp
To: Notwithstanding
Confucious say: Lie down with dogs............get fleas.
It doesn't take a Ph.D. in psychology to know this.
4
posted on
01/29/2003 11:35:09 AM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Liberals SuK; Liberalism SuX)
To: AKA Elena; american colleen; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Aristophanes; ArrogantBustard; Askel5; ...
ping
5
posted on
01/29/2003 11:35:42 AM PST
by
Notwithstanding
(Are you pro-abortion because you were involved with one?)
To: Notwithstanding
Welcome to the world where critical thought is rejected.
It's a queer world, I know, but you'll get used to it, your children have.
[I guess I should send this to the magazine too, eh?]
6
posted on
01/29/2003 11:37:17 AM PST
by
Maelstrom
(Government Limited to Enumerated Powers is your freedom to do what isn't in the Constitution.)
To: Notwithstanding
Hate-filled, shrieking, gay-activist dittos!
7
posted on
01/29/2003 11:37:26 AM PST
by
pabianice
To: Notwithstanding
if homosexuality is caused by genes, THEN WHICH GENES CAUSE IT? WHERE ARE THEY?
8
posted on
01/29/2003 11:40:06 AM PST
by
camle
(Camle pox?!?!? I hope there's a vaccine!)
To: Notwithstanding
There's a great deal of evidence, direct and indirect, that homosexuality stems from childhood experiences and difficulties (lack of love from father, poor relationships with kids of same sex, homosexual molestation). Any loving parent would not want their kid to turn out homosexual and should welcome this book, which helps to prevent many of those situations which are related to the development of homosexuality.
To: yendu bwam
If its genetic, then the natural question is:
"Which genes cause a boy to be the victim of a lack of love from father, poor relationships with kids of same sex, and homosexual molestation?"
10
posted on
01/29/2003 11:45:16 AM PST
by
Notwithstanding
(Are you pro-abortion because you were involved with one?)
To: yendu bwam
Why Judaism Rejected Homosexuality"...We can say chosen because the vast majority of gay men have had intercourse with women. As a four-year study of 128 gay men by a UCLA professor of psychology revealed, More than 92 percent of the gay men had dated a woman at some time, two-thirds had sexual intercourse with a woman. As of now, the one theory we can rule out is that homosexuals are biologically programmed to be homosexual. Despite an understandably great desire on the part of many to prove it (and my own inclination to believe it), there is simply no evidence that homosexuality is biologically determined.
11
posted on
01/29/2003 11:48:01 AM PST
by
onedoug
To: Notwithstanding
Tell that to the male sheepWhat about lesbianism then? What about other animals and homosexual exclusiveness? What percentage of male sheep rape? What percentage of male sheep go after young sheep? How many male sheep do not have exclusive sexual partners? What percentage of male sheep behave any other undesirable way? Many bad behaviors have been with us from the beginning. Greed is natural. Lust is natural. That's no argument.
To: Notwithstanding
"...that homosexuality was entirely determined by genes...'
Doesn't that make it a disease?
13
posted on
01/29/2003 11:49:35 AM PST
by
Tacis
To: onedoug
Always amazed me how Hollywood homosexuals like Rock Huson -Montgomery Cliff -- etc could play those roles where they were making love to women
Seemed so weird
14
posted on
01/29/2003 11:53:32 AM PST
by
uncbob
To: Notwithstanding
"... subsequently posted messages on the Internet urging people to harrass me at home (no one else ever did) ...."
And how often have we seen FR posters do this? It's wrong no matter who does it, or for what reason.
All in all this is one of the best treatments of this subject I've ever read.
15
posted on
01/29/2003 12:00:31 PM PST
by
RonF
To: camle
And how is the gene passed along since gays can't reproduce? It takes a heterosexual act to produce ALL people. So if a gay reproduces is he bisexual?
To: Maelstrom
"It's a queer world, I know, but you'll get used to it, your children have."
Is that why the current shorthand among kids for describing something they have a highly disfavorable opinion of is to say, "That's gay!"?
17
posted on
01/29/2003 12:02:56 PM PST
by
RonF
To: RAT Patrol
Many gays have their own children. I know several and they're all screwed up worse than Bill Clinton. But most, if not all are decidedly NOT gay.
strange how that works, Gay children come overwhelmingly fron non-gay parents, and gays who reproduce, have overwhelmingly non-gay children.
genetic huh?
18
posted on
01/29/2003 12:03:46 PM PST
by
camle
(Camle pox?!?!? I hope there's a vaccine!)
To: Notwithstanding
Oh yeah...and how many female sheep have oral sex exclusively...or use fake penises to penetrate female sheep? Does lesbianism exist AT ALL in the sheep world?
This natural argument just does not hold up.
To: RAT Patrol
"And how is the gene passed along since gays can't reproduce?"
Not all genetically-determined characteristics are the product of one gene with a binary solution set. There are many such that are the product of multiple genes, and where the genes themselves can be in more than two states. To oversimplify, one could posit a genetic set up where there are two genes contributing; each parent might be 40% influenced towards being gay, but function as heterosexuals. Their child might then get the characteristics of both and be 80% influenced towards being gay.
There is no proof that this kind of thing exists with regards to sexual orientation. But there are mechanisms that would allow such a thing to be dormant in one or both parents, only to come up as dominant in their offspring.
20
posted on
01/29/2003 12:08:02 PM PST
by
RonF
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-324 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson