Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Aurelius
"President Lincoln's method made sure the rebels would have to fire the first shot, which they maladroitly wasted no time in doing."

So you do acknowledge then, finally, that it was Lincoln who provoked the hostilities.

Bruce Catton suggests that the firing on Fort Sumter energized the exact feeling in the north that President Lincoln wanted. James McPherson called that reaction an "eagle-scream of patriotic fury."

Poor, clueless rebels.

But I tend to think that Maury Klien in "Days of Defiance" is on target. He says there was a lot of confusion on what to do, and who was supposed to do what. Seward gave orders to naval officers -- ignoring SecNav Welles entirely. It was all a big muddle.

It can't be stressed enough that --very--few-- people expected the war that blossomed out of the Spring of 1861. Certainly Lincoln did not. There -was- a real impulse to give up all the forts. But Lincoln never played false with the rebel government or the rebel commissioners.

Walt

569 posted on 01/30/2003 6:26:02 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa (To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
"James McPherson called that reaction an "eagle-scream of patriotic fury."

That was patriotism of the sort that Samuel Johnson was referring to when he characterized patriotism as "the last refuge of a scoundrel".

"Poor, clueless rebels."

In your delusional and grossly distorted view of history only.

577 posted on 01/30/2003 12:53:59 PM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson