A court decision is not incorrect just because you say it is. And it isn't law in the first place.
LOL - Court rulings determine law, which can often be the same as making it. If you think Courts don't make "law", I suggest you learn of a dreadful practice called "judicial activism". You will discover you are very incorrect. It has been the very ruin of society, and began a long time ago. Apparently you think the "consensus of states" ruling is not "law", and is therefore meaningless since it certainly has no basis in the Constitution or the documents that created it's union. It was NOT a pre-existing rule of law and was the legal invention (which illegally usurped the conditions in the documents that created the union) of that Court decision. Now you apparently deny the Court's authority altogether, when all I had done was point out a mistake and hoped we could argue it on appeal since it was obviously incorrect. You're starting to sound like an anarchist.