Not in the least. Between roughly 1820 and 1880 practically every single nation in the western world abolished slavery by peaceful means.
The war came because the slave power resisted a peaceful settlement.
Keeping slavery out of the national territories would have been a good foothold on a peaceful solution and the slave power was adamantly opposed.
Maybe President Lincoln was right when he said that if every drop of blodd drawn by the lash must be matched by one drawn with the sword, then no one could say that the judgments of the Lord were not true and righteous.
That is because the slave power was not willing to give up slavery without a fight. You'll not get the record fairly considered to say anything else:
"The Richmond Examiner stated their choice in unflinching language:
" 'It is all an hallucination to suppose that we are ever going to get rid of slavery, or that it will ever be desirable to do so. It is a thing that we cannot do without;that is righteous, profitable, and permanent, and that belongs to Southern society as inherently, intrinsically, and durably as the white race itself. Southern men should act as if the canopy of heaven were inscribed with a covenant, in letters of fire, that the negro is here, and here foreveris our property, and ours foreveris never to be emancipatedis to be kept hard at work and in rigid subjection all his days. ' "
-- "The Coming Fury" by Bruce Catton
"We have the Executive with us, and the Senate & in all probability the H.R. too. Besides we have repealed the Missouri line & the Supreme Court in a decision of great power, has declared it, & all kindred measures on the part of the Federal Govt. unconstitutional null & void. So, that before our enemies can reach us, they must first break down the Supreme Court - change the Senate & seize the Executive & by an open appeal to Revolution, restore the Missouri line, repeal the Fugitive slave law & change the whole governt. As long as the Govt. is on our side I am for sustaining it, & using its power for our benefit, & placing the screws upon the throats of our opponents".
- Francis W. Pickens, Governor of South Carolina, June,1857
No one at the time thought American slavery was on its last legs, although the slave power stumbled down the one road that would strip them of their human property the fastest.
Walt
Nonsense. The war came because The Lincoln wouldn't have it any other way. He intentionally acted in a manner that both instigated violence and exacerbated it. To the former effect, he sent a fleet of warships to Sumter with the clear intent of instigating a conflict. To the latter, he raised armies of invasion to expand that conflict when it erupted into full fledged war and further dispositioned several non-seceded states toward war by way of those armies and the blockade.
Keeping slavery out of the national territories would have been a good foothold on a peaceful solution
No, not really. As a "solution" it offers nothing to address the desire for political separation from the north.
Maybe President Lincoln was right when he said that if every drop of blodd drawn by the lash must be matched by one drawn with the sword, then no one could say that the judgments of the Lord were not true and righteous.
Or maybe his saying so was an arrogantly presumptuous attempt to rationalize away the sins of his own side by blasphemously characterizing them as divinely acceptable retribution against the sins of another. Sorry Walt, but The Lincoln was not a god and for him to claim legitimacy in his crusade of sin by calling it something other than sin is a blasphemous perversion of the truth and the Christian religion.
"The Richmond Examiner stated their choice in unflinching language
Quote a fringe opinion all you like, Walt. That won't change the fact that even your own source said that opinion was not representative of those beyond the fringe. In the meantime I'll happily point out Robert E. Lee's opinion. He said "There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil. It is idle to expatiate on its disadvantages."
And also for the record, you'll have a hard time convincing much of anyone, Walt - even your own - that opinions from the Fitzhugh fringe were more representative of the south than those of Lee, a mainstream southern figure if there ever was one.