Replies

Red found it convenient to refer back to the one thread where she posted parts of the article and didn't say anything else. I wasn't referring to that particular post.

First, I double checked. Your post to redlipstick on that other thread was addressed to her post that was composed of an article only. You accused her falsely of giving analysis. There is absolutely no other interpretation.

I mentioned the others and you seem to be ignoring them.

I am not ignoring your other thoughts, I reject them.

For rational and sane reasons, but I won't waste my time explaining it.

If you really want, when I get time I will go back and point out exactly what I was responding to.

I am listening now to the RR show live, and it seems that everyone gets so involved in proving what they THINK is RIGHT, rather than whether or not the subject of discussion is factual proof or conjecture.

Too much close-mindedness abounds. On both sides. Kim had an idea a long time ago and I found very few people with enough GUTS to even try it.