[UCANSEE2]

Thanks for responding so kindly. You are making judgments again. I spent more time following this case from the very beginning and even remember discussing with you the fact that you hadn't had time to read something about the case. So you told us you would get back after you had time to read it. You had family in, etc. Remember?

I am under a deadline here at work and I don't have time yet to watch all nine hours of this. (Is it that much ? wow) .

So, if you can't afford me the same courtesy, and instead wish to continue making hateful remarks, well, I can't stop you. You just embarrass yourself.

I know you have spent a lot of time following the case lately and posting on the threads, and again, Thank you for keeping up the fight.

I wish you and others would understand. It is not that I am FOR DW, it is that I am against the misuse of the law to supplant the greed of the media, and the DA.

As for the recently released tapes, After I get to view them, I will then see what I think they mean. I have already heard much of what you and others think, and that is very interesting in and of itself.

In the meantime, I am using what little time I have to read the threads and the replies posted.

BTW, it was 70degrees here today, a record high. Wish I could have been outside all day.

[truth_seeker]

"As for the recently released tapes, After I get to view them, I will then see what I think they mean."

Let me go out on a limb and make a prediction: You will decide that the tapes prove nothing, as far as you are concerned.

Of course, the alternative would be for you to say, you were unconvinced until the tapes--that now you admit he did it.

But my prediction is the former. Why would I make that guess? The SaveDave gang are highly predictable--no amount of evidence is ever enough.