None of this has contained any 'damning evidence'. It has contained conversations that are 'open to interpretation'. If you believe DW guilty, you see the statements one way. If you have doubts he is guilty, or feel that the case was conducted improperly, then you see the statements completely different.
So far, things like 'He shook his head', mean absolutely nothing. If you WANT to believe they do, that is fine. They do not constitute proof.
I still think that all this released information will not contain any 'DAMNING EVIDENCE' and will only be more of the same old 'depends on how you see things' statements.
I have repeated over and over, that I would like to see something beyond the 3 pieces of evidence , which all had suspicious circumstances surrounding their discovery. Without those 3 pieces of evidence, there would be no case.
I still see too much effort by the media, the judge, the DA, and too little by Feldman to accept that all is right, the sky is full of rainbows, etc. I think the circumstances at the time allowed for total corruption on the part of the police and investigators in the interest of finding the girl, because of the pressure on the SDPD and the resulting embarrassment and loss of job (Paul Pfingst) if they could not produce.
Maybe they got lucky and got the right person.
Things still do not fit. Too many pieces of the puzzle had to be ground off on the edges and rammed in with a hammer. They are still doing so.
Wonder what would have happened had the media not been involved at all?