Here are the video clips of the Westerfield interrogation:
Feb 5, 2002 interrogation of David Westerfield, Part 1
RealMedia Video
Cable-DSL/ 56k
Interrogation of David Westerfield, Part 2
RealMedia Video
Cable-DSL / 56k
Interrogation of David Westerfield, Part 3
RealMedia Video
Cable-DSL/56k
After a pause, Westerfield asks one of the detectives to leave his gun, the detective declines.
RealMedia Video
Cable-DSL / 56k
1 posted on
01/08/2003 9:24:19 AM PST by
TomB
To: TomB; MeeknMing
Westerfield wasn't railroaded, he's guilty as sin.
2 posted on
01/08/2003 9:40:13 AM PST by
xJones
(Afterall the screaming and yelling that went on...)
To: TomB
But he didn't do it! He was framed! It was all a conspiracy!....... Didn't you hear the bug guys... it wasn't him....
/Sarcasm.
Doesn't matter how guilty the guy is, still gonna be those rediculous people who refuse to believe he did it.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
More vindication.
(not that it will matter)
8 posted on
01/08/2003 10:11:35 AM PST by
TomB
To: TomB
Yeah, he'll be on death row until he dies--20 years from now from natural causes.
To: TomB
My problem here is that I heard on the news that none of this material was allowed to be presented to the jury. I know that admissability rules allow certain things and not others, but I feel those rules should be re-addressed. I mean, for God's sake, if somebody admits to a crime but a lawyer can disallow their admission on some technicality, the whole idea of being tried by a jury is ridiculous. Juries should be allowed to see anything connected with a case, including past convictions, in determining guilt or innocence. What we seem to be doing is tailoring information one way or another and asking people to make decisions based on incomplete or empty data. If we are to have a trial by jury system of justice, the jury should not only have access to everything concerned with the particular event, but any peripheral information which would clarify the event or put it into context with reality. I think this is one of the flaws in our justice system that is allowing perpetrators to go free and just as importantly, sometimes convicting innocents.
10 posted on
01/08/2003 10:22:01 AM PST by
harrym
To: TomB
"As far as I'm concerned my life is over, the life that I had, the life that I was living is over," Westerfield says in the interrogation conducted the evening of Feb. 5, 2002. Danielle was last seen the night of Feb. 1.Guilty or innocent, he's right on the money there. Once that accusation is made...
11 posted on
01/08/2003 10:27:22 AM PST by
Chemist_Geek
(Better Living Through Chemistry!)
To: Travis McGee; aculeus; general_re; BlueLancer; hellinahandcart; Poohbah
15 posted on
01/08/2003 10:49:01 AM PST by
dighton
To: TomB
Newsflash David...Danielle's life is over.
387 posted on
01/09/2003 8:00:05 PM PST by
Mo1
(Join the DC Chapter and MOVEOUT at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03 -- FReep On!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson