Posted on 12/31/2002 5:59:12 AM PST by ksen
"oo! those awful 'RATS!"
BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Orcs equal Rats...Perfect!!
FReegards...MUD
Spouse and I thought it too long, especially around the area of the ent substory.
I went back and read the other reviews in the last month.
I think the problem is that Jackson presented it as primarily an adventure drama. I think it is more of a epic. What's the difference? I am not sure, but I think an epic blends lyric and pastoral with adrenalin. LOTR is an epic. Jackson tried to convert it to a medieval-flavored Star Wars... and failed.
A successful epic portrayed on the big screen (perhaps the most recent to be successful) is IMHO Lawrence of Arabia. I would note that Lawrence has parts that are slow as well as parts that are fast. (Note: there are probably a few other movies that come close to Lawrence from which a comparison might successfully be drawn. I have just chosen one that happens to be handy, since I happen to have the video on hand and it is fresh in my mind.)
I think the difference is in preparing the viewership. David Lean (director of Lawrence), I think, let the story play itself out, indicated so early, and thereafter gave equal weight to both adventure and emotion. Jackson played his hand very early (ie the battle between the dragon monster and Gandalf) and so set peoples' expectations that the pace would not slacken from there. When it inevitably did (to maintain a vestige of honesty towards the original Tolkien novels) viewers got confused.
At least we did.
Lastly I like to ask myself "What would Tolkien Say" (WWTS :-)?
Well, it may sound immodest, but... I think he would agree with me. Too much emphasis on gore and battle, disturbing what at least I think is one of the most admirable artistic qualities of the novel, the balance between the lyrical and the heroic.
Hopefully Jackson will do Tolkien right on the third installment. I would cringe to envision that future generations of readers, most notably children, will have their expectations irreversibly set by the irregular and flawed course of the cinematic version set by these first installments.
I still think that the effects and the war scenes were good enough to rate TTT at least two stars out of four.
[Mithril underwear donned.]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.