[Alylonee]

You are taking everything I say out of context. It is impossible to even try and reason with you. Never once did I say Golden Retrievers were more dangerous than Pit Bulls. I said that Pit Bulls passed temperament testing at a higher rate than Golden Retrievers. I also said that a German Shepherd, Rottie, Dobie, etc., are equally as dangerous as a Pit Bull if put in similar situations. I realize that a Pit Bull is more likely to win a fight with another dog, but aggressive to humans, they are not. You call yourself a dog lover, yet you come into contact with people who breed dogs for fighting and you have not reported them yet? You’re just as bad as the people who fight these dogs, thank you for proving my point.

[Jeff Chandler]

You call yourself a dog lover, yet you come into contact with people who breed dogs for fighting and you have not reported them yet? You’re just as bad as the people who fight these dogs...

Unless I actually witness the abuse of a dog, I won't go sticking my nose in the business of every degenerate thug in the world. People who do can get hurt.

[Jeff Chandler]

You call yourself a dog lover, yet you come into contact with people who breed dogs for fighting and you have not reported them yet? You’re just as bad as the people who fight these dogs...

Unless I actually witness the abuse of a dog, I won't go sticking my nose in the business of every degenerate thug in the world. People who do can get hurt.

[Jeff Chandler]

Never once did I say Golden Retrievers were more dangerous than Pit Bulls. I said that Pit Bulls passed temperament testing at a higher rate than Golden Retrievers.

Why even bring up some meaningless test if you're not trying to prove that Pitbulls are less dangerous than GTs? What is your point? Mine is that once a PB begins an attack, the victim is as good as dead because of the traits bred into the dog. The same cannot be said of GTs. You seem to be denying the existance of the traits everyone on the street knows are bred into the breed.