Posted on 11/05/2002 1:37:01 PM PST by john in missouri
The vast majority of the working people I am referring to are in the TOP 50%.
Absolutetly.
I wouldn't mind if you elaborate a little. I disagree with you here, since I see progressive taxation as a method of redistribution of wealth, basically a form of egalitarianism
BTW, The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly is one of my favorite movies.
How are you the most "conservative" member of FR?
Do you believe Ken Lay should pay the same percentage in taxes than you?
BTW, The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly is one of my favorite movies.
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly IS my favorite movies.
How are you the most "conservative" member of FR?
For starters: Want REAL tax relief form the workers ($30,000 - $200,000).
Want our borders fully protected (Terrorists and illegals).
Will oppose any politician (Rep or Dem) if I feel the politician is corrupt or not working in the interests of the people and country.
Don't have the latest numbers, but here are the 1998 income levels at each point and the percentage of the total federal income taxes they account for:
Top 1 %............$269,496......34.75 %
Top 5 %.............$114,729.....53.84 %
Top 10 %.............$83,220......65.04 %
Top 25 %.............$50,607......82.69 %
Top 50 %.............$25,491......95.79 %
So, what you are saying is that you favor a tax cut for everyone but the top 2% or so? By your brilliant plan, you would have to raise their taxes to more than 90% to pay for it. That was tried before in the late 50's and early 70's to disasterous results. Even JFK realized such communistic tax system is doomed to failure.
He is a liberal who worships Al Gore and thinks Katherine Harris is the most evil person on the planet. Like many liberals, truthfulness is not his best suit.
I favor a fair tax cut for everyone in the top 50%.
Never supported Gore.
Can you find a more evil person than Empress Harris (other than Jane Fonda).
Don't know any Empress Harris. I do know the classy intelligent nice-looking babe named Katherine Harris who just won her Congressional race.
So you must have loved Bush's tax cut which cut taxes for everyone in the top 50% in roughly the proportion to the amount they paid. Nothing could be more fair than that.
"nice-looking babe" did Empress Harris get the second part of her plastic surgery?
Back in 2000 it seemed they did the right side, but not the left side of her face.
Hey - no flames, you did say she was "nice looking".
Bush gave the wealthy a higher % cut than the working people.
Nothing could be more unfairer than that.
Not true at all.
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bush's tax plan does EXACTLY what you say you want. So really you must love Bush's tax plan now that I have shown you the light, and must alos love the lovely Katherine Harris too for making it all possible! Well, unless you are not being truthful to us....
Now how much change in federal taxes for those earning $1,000,000 or more, and those earning $100,000,000 or more?
Well probably not much. The numbers from $10K to $200K were pretty damn flat and the number for over $200K doesn't indicate there would be a change. You are reaching to deny that this is EXACTLY what you say you stand for. Face it, the Bush/Harris Tax Cut is the Tuco-bad tax cut. Oh, the irony.
Not true.
Oh BTW - ever hear about the AMT, what Bush gives the working people, he takes from the working people?
Oh BTW - ever hear of the increase in payroll taxes, what Bush gives the working people, he takes from the working people?
And I won't bother mentioning increases in excies taxes (i.e., telephone, air travel, etc.)?
Yes, let's give the rich EVERYTHING, as they create jobs for us (i.e., outsourcing to India, Russia, etc.).
Hard to argue when all you just deny an obvious fact.
Oh BTW - ever hear about the AMT, what Bush gives the working people, he takes from the working people?
Bush's tax plan had nothing to do with the AMT. Clinton however did stop the indexing of the AMT exemption which causes more and more people to be effected by this stupid tax.
Oh BTW - ever hear of the increase in payroll taxes, what Bush gives the working people, he takes from the working people?
I assume you are just talking about Social Security and medicare taxes, which the Bush plan did nothing to. Payroll taxes also include Federal Income Tax withholdings, which Bush did lower. Again you have no point.
And I won't bother mentioning increases in excies taxes (i.e., telephone, air travel, etc.)?
Bush's tax plan had nothing to do with these either. Just face it, Tuco-Bad loves Bush's tax cut. You are in denial, I know. Yes, let's give the rich EVERYTHING, as they create jobs for us (i.e., outsourcing to India, Russia, etc.).
Again, as the table clearly showed the tax cut was fairly flat across the board for all incomes (in fact it slightly favored the $50K-200K people you seem so concerned about). You haven't made a point, but I didn't really expect you would. I'll give you Katherine Harris's e-mail address if you would like to send her a love letter.
That's the "dance", Bush says he didn't institute the AMT so he won't change the AMT.
I assume you are just talking about Social Security and medicare taxes, which the Bush plan did nothing to.
Another Bush "dance" , he had nothing to do with the ever increasing payroll taxes, so why should he lower the tax?
I'll give you Katherine Harris's e-mail address if you would like to send her a love letter.
Thanks, but no thanks, I don't want to break up the Harris/Jeb Bush affair.
Yes. That allows me to hire "working people" that then can go and spend their paychecks on things which keeps other businesses going. You see?
a.cricket
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.