Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pistola
This debate goes on & on. Colombus was probably not the 1st, but he had the better press agent working for him; and the USA is basically of European background.

Another interesting fact - A few very ancient Chinese villages have been found on the western coast of Mexico. These were fishing/sea-trading encampments. Archeologists just DON'T want to even discuss these...lol.

2 posted on 10/31/2002 3:40:46 PM PST by Khurkris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Khurkris
It isn't about press. Teh Vikings were there 400 years earlier. They left a small settlement, which dissapeared in a generation.
Chinese, Africans, Egyptian, Irish and Carthaginian exploreres may also have "found" North and/or South America. But they failed to do anyhting with the discovery.
In the long run only 3 groups made a difference: the Eskimos, the nomadic precursors of Indians, and the Spanish. Each of these groups settled/conquered the land in large numbers.
3 posted on 10/31/2002 3:52:34 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson