Replies

Or you mean insults like this:

And the insult was highly deserved by Junior who posted a totally despicable slime at me. Yes, I fight back. I will not stand idle while all you evolutionists do is try to assassinate my character and disrupt the discussion.

And the insult was highly deserved by Junior who posted a totally despicable slime at me.

Really? Let's review.

Junior makes two compatible and non-contradictory statements (stipulated in post 490).

Bones are strong evidence that evolution has occured.
473 posted on 10/14/02 4:39 PM Pacific by Junior

You deliberately misquote him and lie about his position in 498.

Now a 'clue' is 'absolute proof'? What a strange dictionary you evolutionists use.

You lie about Junior's position in post 714:

Junior is going back and forth saying on one post that science proves nothing and on the next that evolution is fact. If science proves nothing then evolution cannot be a fact. He is talking out of both sides of his mouth and you are dishonestly trying to cover up for him.

My initial question at post 731:

One of these things is not like the other. How is this not blatant dishonesty?

Junior's response to me at 733:

It's called "lying for God." g3k gets special dispensation for breaking a commandment because he's doing it "in a good cause." It's a bit like the Clintons running roughshod over individual rights "for the children."

You pitch a substantial hissy fit in 743 (reproduced elsewhere), hoping to elicit an emotional reaction and thereby change the subject.

The lurkers can decide for themselves whether or not Junior's remarks are an accurate characterization or "totally despicable slime." This is not the first time you have frothed and foamed at the mouth when your position becomes untenable, hoping to draw attention away from the many weaknesses in your own arguments and deceptions.

Which reminds me, you have yet to address my question in post 584 (which refers, of course, to the completely factual information I provided in post 576).

And the insult was highly deserved by Junior who posted a totally despicable slime at me.

So, in some cases insults on these threads may be deserved? Have you set yourself up as the final arbiter of who deserves insults, much in the same way you've set yourself up as the final arbiter of who is and isn't Christian and what is and isn't science?