[Condorman]

We are not talking lectures, we are talking discoveries.

Any why do laureates give Nobel Lectures, my tiny-minded demagouge? To discuss the discovery for which hey were awarded the prize.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him think.

Post here any discovery which you think supports evolution and why and we will discuss it. Seems you folk can only appeal to authority and are unwilling to discuss the real scientific facts.

Oh hush, you big liar. As Junior so succinctly put it not too long ago:

A scientific "fact" is that some bacteria have flagella. Your "fact" is that it is impossible for the flagella to have arisen naturally -- that is not a fact, that is a conclusion based upon your own belief that it is impossible. Indeed, others on these threads have shown you one or more possible scenarios of how the flagella arose naturally, but as you are incapable of understanding anything written above a fifth-grade level the explanations went right by you and you continued to spout the same "I've disproven evolution all by myself" drivel for which you have become so famous.

[AndrewC]

Any why do laureates give Nobel Lectures, my tiny-minded demagouge? To discuss the discovery for which hey were awarded the prize.

Friendly reminder, please have your keyboard checked. ;^)

[gore3000]

Post here any discovery which you think supports evolution and why and we will discuss it. Seems you folk can only appeal to authority and are unwilling to discuss the real scientific facts. -me- Oh hush, you big liar.

You again show that you cannot discuss anything honestly. All of you put together are too lame to discuss the scientific facts of evolution so all you can do is insult. Bye loser.