To: PatrickHenry; Admin Moderator
I am dumfounded that someone would call this stuff spam! My daughter is learning this evolution baloney in high school right now and I was bookmarking these very posts for her AND her teacher.
These "creationist" threads are rife with "spam alert" whiners. I understand why some of the medved stuff was pulled but this is just silly. In fact it's worse. It is, in my opinion, an effort to stifle his opponents viewpoint, when made most clearly, under the auspices that it is "spam."
It certainly is not "spam" to me. It is, in fact, highly informative AND thought provoking.
I hope you agree.
746 posted on
10/18/2002 8:45:04 AM PDT by
RobRoy
To: RobRoy
In fact it's worse. It is, in my opinion, an effort to stifle his opponents viewpoint, when made most clearly, under the auspices that it is "spam." PH's evident self-image.

747 posted on
10/18/2002 8:48:43 AM PDT by
AndrewC
To: RobRoy
The fellow in question has no cogent viewpoint. The spams in question were reposts of others' works and long quotes that had little or nothing to do with the post to which the reply was made. Hence, they are spam.
[And we are Devo]
756 posted on
10/18/2002 9:05:51 AM PDT by
Junior
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson