Because there are no "proofs" in science. Proofs are found in mathematics, and one cannot prove a negative (i.e., you cannot prove evolution is wrong mathematically). A proof also follows a set order: If A, then B; if B then C; therfore if A then C. Your arguments follow the order "I cannot understand how something is done so it is impossible."
That you cannot grasp simple concepts makes me wonder how anyone can possibly take you seriously when you spout off about subjects you know absolutely nothing about (geometry, astronomy, paleontology, biology, etc.).
Because there are no "proofs" in science.
Going back and forth again. So refute my facts, my interpretation whatever you call it. I have posted scientific facts. You cannot refute them. Science does not support evolution, it supports Intelligent Design. Evolutionists do not have a single example of a mutation that has made an organism more complex. Evolution does not have a single clear example of a species that has evolved into a more complex species. Evolution does not even have a single clear idea of how evolution could have arisen. Evolution cannot even describe how complex functions could have arisen gradually. Evolution cannot explain the species I have posted in the article. Materialism cannot explain how an ordered Universe, how life could have arisen at random. In other words Junior, what you and your evolutionist/materialistic/atheist friends have to support your theory is just a big fat ZERO.