One more time, Mr
One more time I gave strong evidence for my position, I gave FACTS. You said science cannot prove anything. When I called you and told you that then evolution is nonsense, you went back on what you said and repeated the moronic mantra which neither you nor any evolutionist can back up that evolution is facts. I disproved any sort of materialism in my article and in post# 652 - with facts, with scientific facts. You could refute them so you lamely went into skeptical mode. Okay, here's my post again. Let's see you refute it with facts instead of with the 'science can't prove anything' garbage:
There is such a theory and it has been discussed many times on this site, it is called intelligent design. It has been proven many times to be true and it at the same time proves evolution to be false. The bacterial flagellum is the most famous proof, however there are many more. The story in the article about Newton is one. In fact it has been proven through since then, that is why atheists are proposing an infinite amount of universes as the explanation for our universe. Another proof is the impossibility of abiogenesis which I show in the above article. Another proof is that biologists call the developmentat process whereby one cell multiplies into 100 trillion cells in exactly the correct place, of the exactly correct type during development a program. That is a trifecta against materialism and no one can refute it.
You gave erroneous conclusions, not facts. That you conclude bacterial flagella are too complicated to evolve through random mutation and natural selection is not a "fact" simply because you claim it is. Neither are any of the other "facts" you purport. What you have presented are conclusions based solely upon, "golly gee, I can't figure out how it happened, so it must be too complex to happen naturally, duh huh."
One of these things is not like the other. How is this not blatant dishonesty?