Nothing, that is, except for everything science has accomplished in the last 150 years.
</flaming idiot creationist mode>
Repeating the mantra and offering no proof. Repeating the mantra and not refuting anything I have said in my posts or in the article above. When are you and your evolutionist friends going to show us how those species in the article evolved? What's the matter my statement that they could not evolved is true? What's the matter, you and your friends cannot find a refutation for my NUMEROUS PROOFS against materialistic evolution????????
Yes, nothing that science has accomplished in the last 150 years has tended to prove evolution. In fact, the very year in which the Origins was published, Pasteur disproved materialistic spontaneous generation which only some 10 years later Huxley 'wrote out' of evolution. A few year's later Mendel showed that Darwin's 'melding' theory was totally false. In 1953 DNA was discovered and it showed that creating new functions was virtually impossible. By the year 2000 when the genome project was being completed, we found that genes were just factories and did nothing on their own. That they needed a vast support system for which Darwinian evolution could never account for. So yes, the statement I made some months ago has not been disproven: