Evolution is a theory supported by facts.
Contradicting yourself as usual. When I gave evidence disproving evolution you went into skeptical mode and said:
Then, my child, it isn't science, as science cannot "prove" anything.
655 posted on 10/17/02 10:09 AM Pacific by Junior
Now you go back on what you said and there are such things as scientific facts. Apparently when I show scientific facts there is no such thing as scientific facts. However, when you just repeat the stupid evolutionist mantra that evolution is a fact then there are scientific facts! I have presented facts disproving evolution, call them what you will. You have not refuted them and have lamely fallen back on the skeptical position and then taken it back. When you have some evidence for your side, get back to me. In the meantime, spare me your nonsense rhetoric and your convolutions.
gore3000: Now you go back on what you said and there are such things as scientific facts [sic].
Junior wrote that a) there are facts, and b) the theory of evolution is supported by those facts. Junior has also said that "clue" = "evidence."
It's called "Reading for Comprehension." You more more interested in grandstanding than in actual debate. Your position does not gain any extra credibility via the volume of your posts.
A fact is a fact; science consists of theories supported by facts and observations.