If he had proof of such he would not be doing research on it now would he? Therefore his statements about this supporting evolution are assumptions totally unsupported by evidence. My statements therefore are what science knows about the matter. The statements of Hartwell, like most of the garbage evolutionists state are assumptions and therefore are not evidence and in no way contradict my statement, indeed they verify it.
Dear Lord, give me strength! He has an observation; he has a hypothesis to explain that observation; he's going to do research to see if his hypothesis is correct or if he needs to modify it. That is science, but you wouldn't know that, would you, Mr. "A circle is not an ellipse, the planet's have wildly elliptical orbits, 'strong evidence' equals 'absolute proof,' and 1720 is a really big number."
Actually, now your misrepresentations of science make a lot of sense. You consider science like a religion -- complete and not in need of constant revision. The fact that researchers are constantly doing research is an insult to your sensibilities -- they should "know" the answers already.