Why don't you do something useful. Instead of dredging up old arguments from an old thread that have nothing to do with the subject at hand, namely evolution, answer the question I posed about the Thewissen study eliminating the Mesonychus and placing the Pakicetus, the alleged whale ancestor, far away from the Hippo, which DNA studies show as kissing cousin to the whale. Keep in mind it was no amateur wannabe that was so fooled by the Mesonychus but the world's Darwinian expert on whale evolution. The question is --- Where do you place the Pakicetus in relation to the whale and hippo? The problem for you would be the DNA evidence.
Not my balliwick; ask Vade. Why don't you do something useful. Like offer an alternative theory for a change? You know, a theory? Supported by positive evidence, explaining the existing observations, and that makes unique predictions of future observations?
It's certainly more productive than deliberate obtuseness and snide sideline commentary. After all, if we're going to cast evolution aside, we'll need something useful to replace it.
Nearly forgot, the issue at hand was gore3000's inexplicable quarrel with two of Junior's statements. Particularly relevant to the exploration of this phenomenon are his prior displays of cognitive dissonance, evasion, denial of evidence, selective amnesia, and general megalomania-- what has been colorfully coined: "Holy Warrior Syndrome"