[Heartlander]

With ID, you're postulating a Designer to use as a filter on the observable data. Saying "evolution is wrong" is not evidence for a Designer.

First, ID does not say evolution is wrong, it says that the ‘natural’ mechanisms alone in the processes do not make sense. Some IDers’ go further but so do some Darwinists towards the naturalism spectrum (Princeton University was a Christian College?).
It comes down to basic philosophy (at least for me).

I do not see any new science as a threat to me but can Darwinism say the same. It is general philosophy as far as the “Theory of common descent” goes…

[<1/1,000,000th%]

First, ID does not say evolution is wrong,

I point you to the title of this thread.