So then who is Shapiro talking about when he jumps on Darwinians in "The Third Way"? But the neo-Darwinian advocates claim to be scientists, and we can legitimately expect of them a more open spirit of inquiry. Instead, they assume a defensive posture of outraged orthodoxy and assert an unassailable claim to truth, which only serves to validate the Creationists' criticism that Darwinism has become more of a faith than a science.
More to the point, "stochastic" has nothing to do with slow.
I think you've been on these threads long enough to know the answer to that question. They usually drop out after a rude comment or two.
Biologists are not the monolithic body that they are assumed to be. They agree on very little. If you put a bunch of them in room, they're almost as bad as Physicists.