Ah... What is the truth? Don't beat around the bush, don't obfuscate. Lay your cards on the table. How do you explain the fossil record (attacking the evolutionist view of the fossil record does not constitute an explanation)? How do you explain the DNA evidence (once more, attacking evolution is not an option here)? Do you have anything other than a plaintive wailing that evolution just cannot be true because you can't possibly ever come to accept it?
The fossil record does not need to be explained by me, it needs to be explained by evolutionists. There are no intermediate species in all the important places. The Cambrian shows that there is no way all those species could have evolved in a mere 5 million years from what existed before. So it is evolutionists that need to explain it. And indeed 150 years after Darwin they are still trying to explain it away by saying 'the fossils will be found someday'.
The DNA evidence contradicts evolution. The evolutionists pick and choose what genes will prove their theory in different circumstances as the article Kangaroo, Platypus Are Not Related After All shows. The articles on the fugu fish here and here also show that DNA disproves evolution. If evolution were true all genetic methods of tracing descent would be true, all the 'molecular clocks' would tell the same time. Evolution is not true so they do not.
The above are scientific facts which disprove your theory. Intelligent design explains them perfectly.