Let us go over this carefully
You made this general statement about believers---By opting out of the scientific process, people of faith will be unemployable in many areas of science and be isolated from a decision making role.
You can see how I understood what you were saying in my reply ---Well, there is your problem. You like the Darwininians consider anything, I repeat anything, outside of the Darwinian conception as non-science. Read Dr. James Shapiro, and/or you might actually read some of the links that Gore3000 has provided. Such as this one
You can see I interpret your general statement against believers as coming about due to their rejection of Darwinian concepts not their rejection of science. It would be you that equates the two.
Each and every reponse from you after that included ---I don't see anything non-Darwinian here.
In his commentary "The Third Way", Shapiro most definitely addressed concerns about Darwinian beliefs and demeanor in the debate. I repeat my statement. I believe that you consider any concern about or attack on Darwinian concepts as non-science.
I stand by my statements. Shapiro did not describe any new non-Darwinian theory. And he's right to address concerns. There is very little that is definitely settled by biologists. That's why it seems strange when some folks here use quotes that are so old.