Well, one of those appears to be the evolutionary model - and it manages to say that admirably well.
That's circular reasoning at its worst. You managed to go in a complete circle inside of one sentence.
How about a link to where we can read about abiogenesis and the success in the lab in producing life from non life.
The fact that something happens even under the most extraordinary of circumstances does not mean it never happens.
Yes, and it is possible that the sun could rise in the west tomorrow. However, you would be foolish to accept such speculation as fact.
I also managed to insert two others: the meteorological model and the geological model. I wanted to see who may or may not pick up on this. ;-)
Yes, and it is possible that the sun could rise in the west tomorrow. However, you would be foolish to accept such speculation as fact.
However, if the sun did indeed rise in the west tomorrow, then I would have to modify my understanding of the universe post haste. The difference between myself and a creation scientist is that I'm capable of such conceptual modifications as required to conform with observable phenomena.