In any case, both quotes of Herr Schickelgruber were from "My Struggle/Battle/Tiff/Hissyfit" and therefore the source is of no consequence. However, two things are evident. The first is that PH's quote of the "Gruber" relates to the "creation" of life not how it changes.
("For God's will gave men their form, their essence and their abilities. Anyone who destroys His work is declaring war on the Lord's creation, the divine will." )
It mentions nothing of the mechanism. Which my quote does.
(In both cases, Nature looks on calmly, with satisfaction, in fact. In the struggle for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less determined succumb, while the struggle of the males for the female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the healthiest. And struggle is always a means for improving a species' health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher development. It also has Darwin written all over it.)
Thus if it is relevant to the evolution debate then so is abiogenisis.
Secondly, if both views of "Herr Schick" are melded into one view nearly named previously on this forum, it would designate a "Theistic Darwinian Evolutionist", a dangerously close position to yours. But I think you can safely relate that Herr Schickelgruber's shadow rarely if ever wended its way into the holy places for purpose of worship. And the mouthings of this beast relating to the wishes of God were the ramblings of a non-believer whose purpose was the imposition of Master Race Darwinian ideal on the world making him purely a "Darwinian Evolutionist".
I apologize for the "lost" commas.