[<1/1,000,000th%]

Who says I am anti-science?

I say it because you don't recognize any scientific process. You discount observational evidence and you have no statement of your alternate theory. You hang your hat on "evolution is wrong", and deny any evidence presented to you.

Even your examples aren't "disproofs", although you call them that. What is your scientific background?

[f.Christian]

Welcome! Free Republic is an online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!

[gore3000]

I say it because you don't recognize any scientific process. You discount observational evidence and you have no statement of your alternate theory.

EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED, NEVER

I have also stated my alternate theory many times. Briefly: species are tremendously adaptable. They have a large gene pool which enables them to adapt to different environmental circumstances. This is how they were designed by their creator.