To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I have been doing some reading on this and I haven't seen anything stating that he [Hitler] was a Creationist. Why someone would coin the greatest mass-murderer of modern times as a Creationist is beyond me. It truly shows just how far atheists will go in order to advance their pseudo-scientific theory. What a sad, sad world you people live in.
A repeat of a prior posting, in case anyone missed it the first time:
Here's the rebuttal for all those creationists who keep blaming Darwin for the evils of Hitler. It turns out (verifiable by footnotes linked to the text of Mein Kampf), that ol' Adolph was a creationist.
Adolf Hitler's Religion.
Unlike the creationists who always raise the spectre of Hitler to bash evolution, I shall not play that game. It was an illogical argument when used against evolution (although that never stopped the creos from endlessly using it); and now it would be similarly illogical to use Hitler as an argument against creationism. However, when some whack-job of a creationist uses the Hitler ploy, this link is coming out of my archives and into your face.
For those who want a "better" source for the proposition that Adolf Hitler was a creationist:
"For God's will gave men their form, their essence and their abilities. Anyone who destroys His work is declaring war on the Lord's creation, the divine will."
Mein Kampf, by Adolf Hitler, Volume 2, Chapter 10.
To: PatrickHenry
For those who want a "better" source for the proposition that Adolf Hitler was a creationist: Wonderful Patrick, now Hitler was a Christian and the Pope is not Catholic. What other new insights are you going to provide us? I can use another good laugh.
To: PatrickHenry
For those who want a "better" source for the proposition that Adolf Hitler was a creationist: I almost missed this double B.S.
Still quoting Yoda as the expert. From your Stardestroyer.net expert.
More from the Hitler Expert.
Federation Government Structure"The So'na have developed a procedure to collect the metaphasic particles from the planet's rings."- Admiral Dougherty "A planet in Federation space."- Picard "That's right. We have the planet, they have the technology. A technology we can't duplicate."- Dougherty ... "With metaphasics, life spans will be doubled. An entire new medical science will evolve."- Dougherty ... "There are metaphasic particles all over the Briar Patch. Why does it have to be this one planet?"- Picard "It's the concentration in the rings that makes the whole damned thing work. Don't ask me to explain it- I only know they inject something into the rings that starts a thermolitic reaction. When it's over, the planet will be uninhabitable for generations."- Admiral AnalysisWe learned something very interesting about the Federation government structure in STI: the Federation considers all star systems within its borders to be its property, even if the Federation has never explored these systems and has established no contact whatsoever with their native societies. "We have the planet, they have the technology". Admiral Dougherty was not acting on his own- he had the approval of the Federation Council. This indicates that the decision to remove the Ba'ku from their world and render it uninhabitable to harvest the life-extending "metaphasic particles" was actually sanctioned at the highest levels of the Federation government. The implications of this fact are far-ranging: the Federation, due to the limitations of warp drive, has not explored the vast majority of star systems in its own territory, particularly the regions of its territory which are far from its heavily populated areas (near their borders with the Romulan Star Empire and the Klingon Empire). However, they have arbitrarily drawn borders around a large region of space and they have staked sovereign claim to all of the systems in this territory! This is very similar to the European colonists' behaviour when they invaded North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. They staked sovereign claim to most of the continent in the name of their monarch, simply by virtue of declaring that it belonged to them. They had not explored this land, nor had they negotiated any sort of ownership transfer with the natives. When they found natives occupying the land that they had unreasonably staked claim to, they simply removed them by force (sometimes sanctifying their behaviour by talking them into signing treaties they didn't understand, so they would have paper justification). Similarly, the Federation has apparently staked claim to a large region of space even though it has not explored or colonized most of it, and inconvenient occupants of that territory can be forcibly moved out of their homes if the Federation decides to seize control of their systems. Further ramifications |
|
And I repeat
Adolf the Darwinist
Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
Volume One - A Reckoning
Chapter XI: Nation and Race
In both cases, Nature looks on calmly, with satisfaction, in fact. In the struggle for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less determined succumb, while the struggle of the males for the female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the healthiest. And struggle is always a means for improving a species' health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher development.
Straight out of the Darwinist Handbook.
408 posted on
10/13/2002 8:13:36 PM PDT by
AndrewC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson