Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior; VadeRetro; longshadow; Piltdown_Woman
In the current issue of Scientific American (not yet up on their website) there's a section in the "letters to the editor" regarding responses to the "Creationist Nonsense" article from a few months ago. It reads like one of our threads.
285 posted on 10/13/2002 5:57:29 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
In the current issue of Scientific American (not yet up on their website) there's a section in the "letters to the editor" regarding responses to the "Creationist Nonsense" article from a few months ago. It reads like one of our threads.

The article on 'Creationist Nonsense' by the editor of Scientific American has been thoroughly refuted in 15 ANSWERS TO JOHN RENNIE AND SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN’S NONSENSE . Rennie's article is a shamefully UNscientific diatribe on opposition to evolution. It shows to what extent the ideologues of evolution have to go to in order to support their faith. They have to totally discredited themselves to do so.

292 posted on 10/13/2002 7:14:09 AM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson