Here your being ridiculously thickheaded to the point of meriting no further response.
And in case you didn't know it, llamas and camels, which diverged 30 million years ago, can produce viable offspring which may be fertile.
Basic verbal comprehension skills should indicate that I've addressed this point. Evolutionary science presents an explanation of this, by the way, although I concede Creation Science does as well (because God felt like it..)
It is your definition. And the point of your tap dance is to hide the fact that having such a tenuous and shape-shifting definition of species allows the just so stories to abound using the Darwinian "science".