Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: xsmommy
I honestly pray that Rehnquist et al. read NRO

I am in the mood for some jurisprudential Smackdown.

158 posted on 10/04/2002 8:29:42 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: hobbes1
Given the harsh criticism of the Bush v. Gore decision, I fear that the Court won't take the case. While there may be strong prudential reasons for the court to avoid another election quagmire, it will be a shame if the Court ducks the issue. Given the relative strength of the Article I constitutional argument, and the extraordinary weakness of the New Jersey ruling, this would provide an apt vehicle to clarify what is now a repeated question of election law

I am in the mood too, darling. hope we get some.

161 posted on 10/04/2002 8:43:03 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: hobbes1
the tiger's soon to be lunchtime hangout...
166 posted on 10/04/2002 9:35:43 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson