Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
I maintain that it was as rebellious section of the United States.

On what possible legal premise do you make this claim OTHER than the absolutely spurious construct of the Lincoln forces who posited that, somehow, the federal government pre existed the states and created the states.

271 posted on 09/28/2002 5:49:09 AM PDT by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: Bigun
On what possible legal premise do you make this claim...

On the premise that the southern acts of unilateral secession were not acts allowed under the Constitution and therefore constituted rebellion. The Supreme Court agreed with that, BTW, in Texas v. White in 1869.

272 posted on 09/28/2002 6:29:13 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson