Replies

I know these are big questions to you and your like minded posters but they're not. It's interesting I've been reading for weeks you people theorizing maybe there wasn't a gun. Why do you waste your time like this?

The originally story was the gunman spoke to MK and threatened her not to tell her parents and later this was changed to the gunman threatened Elizabeth if she made any noise. The discussion about perceiving a threat means MK felt threatened regardless of whether the gunman actually made the threat to Elizabeth or MK. We've had posters on this board say they were taken at gunpoint and they responded to the kidnapper's demand to remain silent so no one would be hurt.

I've also seen this discussion on why the police would let the neighbors check around the neighborhood since the kidnapper was armed. Who could possibly think the kidnapper would still be hanging around the neighborhood 4 hours after the kidnapping? Puhleeze.

IMHO, the story was changed because; if the "intruder" had spoke to MK, it shows he saw her in the bed with Liz. this version makes more sense as to why MK had to wait 2 hours to tell her parents. However, this conflicts with MK seeing the "intruder" in 2 places in the home. Difference between Mk directly being threatened and Mk just overhearing something is huge.