Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherlock
As you said, MO is one thing that argues against it having been ex-bishop Dixon who took Elizabeth. There he was, with a "stable" of young potential victims right there where he could get at them. Doesn't seem to me that he'd need to be breaking into a house to get a victim.

Plus, since he was a bishop at the time, seems he could have found some less risky way to get at Elizabeth--if he even knew of her existence (which we don't even know) and if for some reason he wanted her above other more available victims (which we also don't know.)
105 posted on 09/26/2002 10:31:00 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse
Doesn't seem to me that he'd need to be breaking into a house to get a victim.

Maybe he didn't "break in." Maybe they had things in common, running, jogging, religion, etc.

114 posted on 09/26/2002 10:48:40 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Devil_Anse
anybody could have found a less risky way to get liz. remember the initial facts were presented by the smart clan. either ricci is a genius, {if you believe this, stand up and say so} or something else is true.
314 posted on 09/28/2002 2:11:35 AM PDT by jandji
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson