NO, it is the attitude expressed here ---Those statements are also rather poorly supported. I expect that contributed to his removal from this forum. ---that is of low merit.
Free expression of ideas except for those I deem strange. He harmed no one.
You have more integrity than that Andrew; don't put words in my mouth. "Poorly supported." By which I mean, "a noteworthy absence of observations that might lead to such a conclusion."
Strange? Sure. I'm all about strange. And there are many strange theories out there. Some of them, however, are more valid than others, by virtue of support from equally strange observations.
I have no problem with anyone who wants to float a new idea. As long as support and defense is part of the package. Are you willing to defend Medved's theories?