Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jamieson
So the "reasonable doubt" defense has to go!

Of course not, and you know me better than to imply that I don't believe in our system of justice and that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt a defendent's guilt.

To my mind that would not include spinning false tales for the jury.

291 posted on 09/20/2002 10:37:59 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
"To my mind that would not include spinning false tales for the jury".

Since under our law, only the jury is charged with determining the facts, this would apply to ALL lost cases.
295 posted on 09/20/2002 10:42:20 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson