That's certainly a common ruse of people who abduct children.
I am positive that, in the interviews discussing Mary Katherine, either Ed or Lois has said that there was something besides just the sound of the voice--something in the context of what the person said--that tended to reveal his identity. The police have also very pointedly said that they are not revealing all the words that were said that night.
I have to wonder why this is such a big secret.....yet another gaping hole in what we have been told about the "tremendous amount of information" that MK has reportedly provided to the police.
Yes they do, I agree. But I agree it will work on a 4-5 yr. old..but Samantha Runyun was 5 and she knew what to do..kick and scream..she did all that.
I believe that Elizaabeth, with her upbringing both in LDS and in the family was not one who would believe a worker in the middle of the night for crying out loud..and go quietly with him!
sorry, can't agree here.
When was this crime committed? June 5?...and MK told the police she recognised the voice...whan was that? It was before Ricci died tho.
And they did not arrest him !Or name him as the alleged kidnapper , and prepare for trial. (I know he was in prison at the time of the voice identification)
The eye witness would be questioned in court to name him. (even if it was in black face)..but if they have the identity..where is the arrest?