I'm still waiting for a copy and paste of this alleged statement from the source. I have the article right here, and I am finding nothing......other than Suann Adams' statement which contradicts statements made by the district attorney and the responding police officers.
I'll be back later to see if either of you have come up with anything......
There are other articles which address the issue of who was at the house first. The article you're talking about contained surprisingly candid statements by police, blaming themselves for allowing the scene to be contaminated. As I told Sandude, I haven't paid too much attention to the furor over whether the police or the neighbors were called first. This is b/c it does not seem unnatural to me for a man in that position to maybe call his neighbors early on, maybe even b/f the police. A person wants to only call police if necessary, not waste their time on a momentary episode of mistake and hysteria.
So I'll root around among some articles, perhaps at Brigette's site, and see what I can dig up about who got there first. But, other than the idea of people trampling forensic evidence, I don't really consider it a key point whether the police or the neighbors were called first, and I don't think it necessarily tells us much. I do find it odd that Sue Ann Adams' name keeps coming up in this case.