It is our institutions that need protection. The Smarts should be given the benefit of a presumption of innocence. Law Enforcement should be looked upon as purveyors of truth. While we know that LE could be misleading the public in order to catch a criminal it is also possible that all we have been told is true.
WHAT??????????
Presumption of innocence and questioning the testimony of an alleged eye witness to a crime are two entirely different issues, sandude.
BTW, what are the "institutions" that need protection?