The doors could have been closed, perhaps even by the abductor before entering Liz's room.
There have been reports that Elizabeth and her abductor even stopped by the bathroom during the abduction.
Not confirmed.
We have been lead to believe that Elizabeth was forced to go with this man against her will.
An eyewitness reported this. Either you believe Mary Katherine or you don't. If you don't then you have to believe that LE is completely stupid to have a 9 year old girl fool them for over 3 months.
This modus operandus would have involved an incredible amount of risk to the perpetrator.
A cat burglar thrives on this risk. I think a psychologist could even make a case that this type of criminal could look for greater risks as time went on much in the same way a drug addict goes for more powerful or stronger doses to get high.
I find it very hard to believe that a 14 y/o girl and her 9 y/o sister would both remain absolutely quiet during a forced abduction as has been described.
I don't find this hard to believe. Either through a belief that being quiet would bring a quick end to this "hostage" situation or from fear that making any noise would get Elizabeth or her family killed. I am looking forward to the day when the perpetrator’s words are made known.
Even if attempts were made to remain silent, I find it hard to believe that two parents in the next room would sleep through all of this activity.
Some people, especially those in homes that have many occupants, will sleep through most incidental noise. There is nothing remarkable about the parents not waking especially if their door was closed.
This is getting old, sandude.....for both of us, I'm sure. Go back and read what I said in post # 701. I in no way believe that MK has "fooled" the police. Rather, I think it is far more likely that the police are attempting to fool the suspect(s) into believing what they want them to believe.
As for your other "explanations" for things I found doubtful about MK's alleged story.....I simply don't buy them. Things that you find unremarkable, I do find remarkable. Things that seem perfectly logical to you do not seem logical at all to me. "Official explanations" that satisfy you don't satisfy me. I didn't find the "armed gunman" story plausible the first time I heard it, and I have heard nothing since that has removed my doubts.
I guess this puts you and me back at that "agree to disagree" point.....
really ?