Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: scaredkat
Scaredkat, I do remember that in one of your earlier posts, you talked about Size 8 footprints near that mine.

As for the brand of shoes that Elizabeth supposedly took, I'd always heard they were Ralph Lauren. Now, someone said Polo, didn't they? But I think Ralph Lauren IS Polo...?

I'm sure you know that they have a picture of the type of shoes they say she took, on the official Elizabeth Smart website. Of course, they don't show the treads on the shoes, they just show the color and style.

Besides, I'd think that any set of female footprints, next to a set of male footprints, would have been of interest. I know you said the police smudged over the whole thing, and the tire tracks, too. Did you take any pictures of the tracks b/f they ruined it?
174 posted on 09/18/2002 9:18:08 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse
As for the brand of shoes that Elizabeth supposedly took, I'd always heard they were Ralph Lauren.

I just went to elizabethsmart.com and they have a picture of an exact copy of Liz's shoes. They are Reebok's.

176 posted on 09/18/2002 9:21:25 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Devil_Anse
On the shoes they were smaller than mine but not by much so I stated that they are probably a 71/2 to 8 shoe.

I finally was shown the imprint of those shoes, but I had to give it back. They are keeping that very tight lipped thats why I was so definite on the shoes because I just knew something and then they gave in but still wonder what kind of shoe they are.
All I can say to people, is dont always believe what the press or especially the police say on the air, they dont quite tell you the truth because thats how they weed things out. As for where I was, the problem is sheriffs did come out and search, but they were not the ones on the actual case, so what would they really know?

I also have received some jolting news from another police officer that was on the ricci case which inturn involved him on the Elizabeth case. Some of it is his own opinion and some of it is fact.
his opinion- ricci didnt do it not involved at all with that case. but at first he was 85% sure he did.
fact--
ricci didnt take his jeep someone else did, yes they know who it was. (dont ask, I dont feel good about stating this right know.)
There is more than one person involved.
They are working with a psychic and the report is, well lets just say my phone rang.
They are looking very close to two people, (yeah go ahead and guess).
Ricci investigation is.. he was involved in something else and they are still working on this, there is someone else they are watching that has a meth lab and keeps leaving and coming back with mud all over his truck.
Someones alibi doesnt match up. (cant say his name either).

188 posted on 09/18/2002 9:51:40 PM PDT by scaredkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson