Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
Morning...

The jury believed an intruder entered the home of the van dams. The jury believed the intruder was dw because of the evidence. That's not being spoiled...the defense failed in creating doubt.
518 posted on 09/17/2002 6:20:15 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]


To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
the defense failed in creating doubt.

Because there was no doubt to create... Westerfield is, was and always will be guilty as sin! I suggest these nutballs who suggest he is some sort of martar check their papers this morning. Westerfield was minutes away from a plea bargain that including disclosing where he dumped this poor little girls body, when it was stumbled upon by that poor guy.

Westerfield is a sick sadistic bastard, the needle is far too good for him, and these people who refuse to accept reality because they morally have issues with the parents behavior, are quite frankly just as sick.

530 posted on 09/17/2002 6:55:38 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
You made a reply just above where you said, "..it could have been a nose bleed, but there was no adequate proof it was there by innocent means."

That's the gist of it. Westerfield was convicted to to a "Presumption of Guilt" -- not the requisite "Presumption of Innocence". Rather than insist that the prosecution prove that Danielle was murdered, murdered by Westerfield, and pertinant to that perverted CA judiciary construction of a seperate "penalty phase" murdered most heiniously by Westerfield ... the Court in this trial allowed and encouraged the Jury to operate under presumption of guilt, where the defense was demanded to produce proof beyond any doubt that Westerfield did NOT murder, and murder hieniously this young girl. It was a nigh impossible standard for the defense to meet. Your statement is a clear indicator of the fale logic this "he's guilty already" procedure entails.

536 posted on 09/17/2002 7:12:39 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson