Posted on 09/16/2002 1:46:27 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
Death
Posted on 09/17/2002 8:28 AM Eastern by Bug
Plea deal 'minutes away' when body found![]()
By J. Harry Jones
STAFF WRITER
September 17, 2002
Minutes before Danielle van Dam's remains were found Feb. 27, David Westerfield's lawyers were brokering a deal with prosecutors:
He would tell police where he dumped the 7-year-old girl's body; they would not seek the death penalty.
Law enforcement sources told The San Diego Union-Tribune yesterday defense lawyers Steven Feldman and Robert Boyce were negotiating for a life sentence for the 50-year-old design engineer, a neighbor of the van Dams in Sabre Springs.
The deal they were discussing would have allowed Westerfield to plead guilty to murder and be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, said the officials, who spoke on condition they not be identified.
Prosecutors were seriously considering the bargain when Danielle's body was discovered off Dehesa Road that afternoon, nearly four weeks after she disappeared from her bedroom.
"The deal was just minutes away," one of the sources said.
It was aborted, but details were confirmed yesterday soon after a San Diego Superior Court jury recommended the death penalty for Westerfield.
The officials outlined this chronology:
Feldman and Boyce were at the downtown San Diego jail discussing the final arrangements with Westerfield when volunteer searchers found Danielle's remains beneath trees along Dehesa Road east of El Cajon.
When the lawyers left to meet with prosecutors, they noticed members of the news media gathering in the street and asked what was happening.
After being told a body had been found, they went directly to the nearby Hall of Justice and met with prosecutors. The defense lawyers were handed a copy of a Thomas Guide map of the Dehesa area on which a circle had been drawn indicating the location of the body.
Feldman and Boyce took the map back to Westerfield and later telephoned to say they no longer "had anything to discuss regarding a plea bargain."
Neither Feldman nor Boyce could be reached for comment last night.
Danielle was reported missing from her home the morning of Feb. 2, and Westerfield, who lived two doors away, quickly became the primary suspect. He was watched closely by police for weeks as authorities and volunteers searched from the Sabre Springs neighborhood to the Imperial County desert.
After DNA results linked Westerfield to the crime, he was arrested Feb. 22 and charged with kidnapping and burglary.
Three days later, even though Danielle's body had not been found, District Attorney Paul Pfingst announced murder and kidnapping charges would be filed that could carry the death penalty.
Many law enforcement officials feared Danielle's body might never be found. Then, on Feb. 27, volunteer searchers combing the Dehesa area, far from where police had focused, found Danielle's badly decomposed remains.
At that point, the official sources said yesterday, any opportunity Westerfield and his lawyers had to win a plea bargain evaporated.
email
You see, here is where I have a hard time believing this, whenever you start "adjusting" beyond absolute fundamentals.. you are at the whim of the statistician... what they decide to make relevant. (Sort of like the global warming models that were just totally debunked last week because the poles were actually far colder than they believed). You have to know the details of how and why they got to "all other things equal".
I know this, in nearly every state, a white man who kills a minority is far more likely to get the death penalty than any other sort of case. Years ago, this was not true, anymore it definately is. Of course this sort of crime occurs far less frequently that black on white or black on black crime... it is sad, but it is indeed a fact.
Are there individual states who may have problems? I am willing to accept that.. but the general overall view that it is racial unfair across the board I don't agree with at all.
It is understandable that a lower socioeconomic perpetrator judged by a lower socioeconomic jury, who live their lives surrounded by crime would be less tolerant of a violent act, than say a middle or upper class individual judged by middle or upper class jury. Does this make either situation prima facia racist? I don't think so. IF you live your life surrounded by violence, you certainly will be harsher toward it, than someone whose live violent crime rarely enters.
Can't argue with you there. I can only add that the victim's parents are just as evil.
Cordially,
I agree with you entirely. The longer the trial went on, the more I believed Westerfield was involved, if not the pirmary perp. However, I still do not believe the parents are not quilty. The morning when Dan. was found missing, the mother talked of her in the past tense as though she knew she were dead and described her physically as though she were Westerfield. Then Brenda lied like crazy on the stand about not dancing with Westerfield. I believe both she and her husband know a lot more than they're letting on. And that's what concerns me. I do not consider Danielle's death avenged until her parents are brought to justice.
What do you think -- is it better to corrupt and bend the due process to convict a murderer that one knows -- by unpresentable evidence to be guilty, than to let him skate for inability to make a straight case against him?
You see, this is where you lose any sort of moral high ground. Attempting to equate "swinging" or wife swapping with Kidnapping, sexual assault and murder is ludicrous. You may not agree with the parents behavior, and I certainly don't, but to equate the two is just insanity. Even if you believe the parents activities were evil.. so say they are "just as evil" is rediculous.
Your argument is essentially the same as saying US deserved 9/11/2001 because we have bases on muslim soil, and sometimes do things the rest of the world doesn't agree with, and so that is equivalent of slamming airplanes into buildings butching innocents. They are not equivalent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.