Posted on 09/09/2002 8:52:09 PM PDT by stlnative
New thread...
Sherlock, you're on a roll tonight! Another great catch. (Except for your Mormon bashing. Have you considered reading Mormon history rather than revisionist history propagated by anti-Mormons?)
The "threatened to take a third hostage" is the same M.O. as the E.S. abductor. I hadn't seen this before. YANIRC - Yet Another Nail In the Ricci Coffin.
Yes, I remember that. The first thing I read about him also he only talked about one car, never mentioned a 2nd. He also said he made a 911 call to police while taping the car and I've never heard that mentioned again. Also in this LKL interview he later refused to say if the 2nd vehicle was a Jeep and gave Geragos a little lecture that they shouldn't focus exclusively on Ricci. He said at that time the FBI would have finished IDing the makes & models of the two cars by the end of that week.
Does your IQ reach double digits?
I can't imagine a political conservative would ever look at this and there is no clearer indication of a THINKING LIBERAL MASQUERADING ON THIS CONSERVATIVE THREAD than someone that focuses on this immateriality.
B-S
We are in agreement that Ricci had no obligation to say anything to the police.
However, what we have witnessed of Ed Smart & family, and LE, is not conjecture. If you can say that you have heard Angela contradict herself from one interview to the next, I take that as fact. Does she do it to deceive, or is she merely filling in vacant spots, something she previously forgot, or has come to see in a different light? That's what you really do not know.
We have given leeway to the Smarts for their early lapses. We have granted that LE has the right to withhold evidence from the public. But how far are we supposed to go with this when it has become so obviously comparable with another unsolved case - the Ramseys? One big difference is that they had a body.
I haven't read one post on any of these many threads from "Ricci lovers," building a scenario of guilt on any member of the Smart family. Not one neighbor has been accused by us that I've seen.
Yet we all know this type of crime is more likely to have been committed by someone close to the victim.
Ohhh, I got it. There were two, there white Jeeps there the first time Moul fixed the electronic fuel pump, so the second time he fixed the electronic fuel pump, because he did a crappy job the first time and he's dishonest and Ed Smart ripped Angela off, he probably also had two, three white Jeeps there that time also so, even though I don't think the Jeep had anything to do with the disappearance, to be honest with you, I just think if it was Rick's Jeep that was gone, instead of one of those other two, three white Jeeps he probably had there, it was just weird timing.
I'm not aware of anyone that claimed that he did. He confessed to theft and burglary of the Smart and Adams homes.
I'm sure you meant to add that he failed the polygraph.
Your distortions are becoming legendary.
Ohhh, I got it. There were two, there white Jeeps there the first time Moul fixed the electronic fuel pump, so the second time he fixed the electronic fuel pump, because he did a crappy job the first time
Sherlock, take a deep breath. There was absolutely nothing said about fixing a fuel pump a SECOND TIME. Angela was trying to correct Moul about what needed to be fixed on the jeep when she made the phone call. He apparently got the repair work mixed up with other similar vehicles at his garage.
How hard is that to understand?
Furthermore, while you and JG and a few others are totally obsessed with this irrelevant jeep, the real perpetrator is probably laughing up his sleeve.
No, he didn't. The results have never been released.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.