Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Smart thread, September 5, 2002-?

Posted on 09/04/2002 8:39:12 PM PDT by IamHD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 1,081-1,100 next last
To: Sherlock
Possibly. But the notion popped into my head that Thurber's testimony might be in question.
761 posted on 09/08/2002 9:17:19 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: scaredkat
Every possibility should be considered, scaredkat.
762 posted on 09/08/2002 9:19:52 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: Sherlock
I would imagine he was over there and saw her take them or saw the effects on her or she told him.

"I would imagine".....now that's really stating facts.

763 posted on 09/08/2002 9:21:48 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: lakey
But the notion popped into my head that Thurber's testimony might be in question.

I would think it might be, for sure.

764 posted on 09/08/2002 9:24:22 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
I see we have some new "distractions." JG must need help.
765 posted on 09/08/2002 9:26:38 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: lakey
I see we have some new "distractions." JG must need help.

Noticed that, lakey.

766 posted on 09/08/2002 9:31:14 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies]

To: cookiedough
In my state, lawyers are not allowed in the grand jury room. They may wait outside the room, and consult with their client there.

Thanks for the information. It was an assumption on my part so maybe Smith wasn't in there with her. I believe that he still would have advised her to invoke her rights though.

767 posted on 09/08/2002 9:31:47 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 758 | View Replies]

To: lakey
Lakey, do your recall if a court appearance date was set for Dixon? Thanks.
768 posted on 09/08/2002 9:32:06 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
scaredkat, though, is very interesting.
769 posted on 09/08/2002 9:32:37 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies]

To: sandude
I believe that he still would have advised her to invoke her rights though.

He certainly would if he's a reputable lawyer.

770 posted on 09/08/2002 9:33:23 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: lakey
scaredkat, though, is very interesting.

Yes, and remarkably candid -- no fear of flames.

771 posted on 09/08/2002 9:34:28 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 769 | View Replies]

To: Sherlock
Maybe the address you found on athand.com is his office address. I'm going to athand in a minute. However, it's not like I'll recognize the street by name, I'll have to look at a map. (Mapquest to the rescue, of course.) I've never been to SLC.

I have this vague memory of looking the doctor up when I first heard of him in the news. I sort of got it mixed up with when I looked up the air conditioner guy (Corey Dennis) a long time ago. (Corey Dennis--gave a story about this case, and his AC work in the Smart home, to a tabloid.)
772 posted on 09/08/2002 9:36:32 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
"-- no fear of flames." LOL! Thank God! 'cause this isn't the place to be if you're on the touchy side.
773 posted on 09/08/2002 9:36:48 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
I would imagine he was over there and saw her take them or saw the effects on her or she told him.

Well how do you think he knew, varina, do you think he told this as fact just because he has the 'gift of suspicion' like you do with that Mormon bishop??? He's may not look very bright but I'm sure he's not a complete moron like you.

774 posted on 09/08/2002 9:39:00 PM PDT by Sherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies]

To: Sherlock
Well how do you think he knew, varina

I don't think he "knew" anything for sure. Just out of curiosity, why do you always feel the need to use name-calling in your posts and replies?

775 posted on 09/08/2002 9:42:06 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Sherl has no other way to vent when he/she's in a corner.
776 posted on 09/08/2002 9:44:53 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
No court date has been set. Dixon was arrested, $100,000 bail, he paid it and was released.
777 posted on 09/08/2002 9:46:10 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Does Dixon own a white truck?
778 posted on 09/08/2002 9:48:58 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies]

To: cookiedough
"It will be interesting to see if Angela is recalled by the grand jury, now that Rick has died."

You said it!

Wait a minute. If you have time, you ought to go to google and check this out--there is stuff there on Utah marital privilege. (Unfortunately, at the moment I am too much of a dolt to be able to post cites, but I'm going to try to learn.)
Any way, I found this on google, about Utah:

"See...Rule 28(1), Utah Rules of Evidence (1971)--The Committee intends that, during the life of the communicating spouse, the non-communicating spouse may claim the privilege on behalf of the communicating spouse if the latter is alive but not present to assert it. UPON THE DEATH OF THE COMMUNICATING SPOUSE, THE PRIVILEGE CEASES TO EXIST." (Caps are mine, I have been too lazy to learn how to do bold print, but intend to learn.) I don't know how current the above is, but it looks to me like Angela can't claim the privilege any more.

So if the grand jury calls her back, seems to me we can conclude that she claimed the marital privilege, at least to some extent, in her previous appearances.

BTW, that 502 thing I posted earlier appears to be from the Uniform Rules of Evidence.
779 posted on 09/08/2002 9:54:41 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]

To: lakey
I don't know, the two articles did not mention his choice of cars.
780 posted on 09/08/2002 9:55:40 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 1,081-1,100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson